Background
Safety
concerns, rising costs, and blood shortages
are some of the reasons behind the move
towards blood management and promoting
autologous infusion. The prevailing medical
consensus is summarized by Isbister:
Altruistically
donated allogeneic blood transfusion
should only be used as therapy
when there is evidence for potential
benefit, there are no alternatives, a
quality product is available and the
risks are appropriately considered and
balanced against the benefits.
SAFETY
Providing
safe blood for transfusion remains a
challenge. Despite advances in preventing
transmission of hepatitis B, hepatitis C,
and AIDS/HIV, transfusion-transmitted
bacterial infection remains a significant
risk.
Kansas City patient's case highlights
risks of tainted platelets (27 Oct.
2008)
Platelets infected with E. coli
contributed to patient's death (28
July 2006)
Eder AF, et al. and
the American Red Cross Regional Blood
Centers.
Bacterial screening of apheresis
platelets and the residual risk of
septic transfusion reactions: the
American Red Cross experience
(2004-2006). Transfusion 2007;47
(7):1134-42.
As well, many adverse events are
associated with the transfusion of
allogeneic blood products:
Viral risks
such as HIV,
although extremely rare, have not totally
disappeared:
There is
growing evidence that human herpesvirus 8
(HHV-8), previously thought unlikely
to be transfusion-associated,
may be transmissible by blood
transfusion:
Chagas Disease
There are now multiple reported cases of
transfusion-transmitted Chagas disease
(caused by the parasite caused by Trypanosoma cruzi) in the USA and
Canada, with continued calls for blood banks
to screen for the T. cruzi parasite:
vCJD
Other risks such as
variant Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease (vCJD)
remain worrisome. Blood centers worldwide
have instituted criteria to reject donors
who may have been exposed to vCJD. There are
now four suspected cases in the United
Kingdom and donors whose blood was
transfused to people who died of vCJD have
been warned that they may be carrying the
disease.
WNV
Because
West Nile Virus (WNV) can be transmitted by
blood transfusion and most patients with WNV infection
are likely to be asymptomatic, a blood donor
screening test for WNV was implemented in
July 2003.
TRALI
Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI)
remains a life-threatening complication of
transfusion:
Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury
(TRALI) (Canadian Blood Services)
Blood Donations From Previously Pregnant
Women Restricted
- Bueter M,
Thalheimer A, Schuster F, Bock M, von
Erffa C, Meyer D, Fein M.
Transfusion-related acute lung injury
(TRALI) - an important, severe
transfusion-related complication.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006 Aug 15;
[Epub ahead of print]
- Swanson K, Dwyre DM,
Krochmal J, Raife TJ.
Transfusion-related acute lung injury
(TRALI): Current clinical and
pathophysiologic considerations.
Lung 2006 May-Jun;184(3):177-85.
-
Transfusion-related acute lung injury:
epidemiology and a prospective analysis
of etiologic factors. Blood. 2003
Jan 15;101(2):454-62.
-
Transfusion-related acute lung injury
(TRALI)--under-diagnosed and
under-reported. (editorial) Br J
Anaesth 2003 May; 90(5):573-6.
Transfusion-associated Immunomodulation
Transfusion-associated
immunomodulation (TRIM) has been reported
since the 1970s. Evidence-based approaches
suggest that an adverse TRIM effect probably
does exist, and even if the effect is small,
it represents a clinically important
complication of transfusion:
Human Error
Human
errors present more of a risk than
transmissible diseases as shown by the
Serious
Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) reports
from the UK. Human error also results in
many recalls of blood products that were
mistakenly issued from blood suppliers.
Misidentification leading
to blood of the wrong blood group being
transfused can result in life-threatening
transfusion reactions:
OTHER
FACTORS
Costs
Costs
have risen due to adoption of improved
screening tests for transmissible diseases
and government-mandated patient and hospital
notification requirements for blood products
identified as having increased risk for
disease transmission. While such advances
improve safety, they also increase the cost
of obtaining and processing blood. See, for
example:
-
New Published Study Finds the Cost of Blood Transfusions is Significantly Under-Estimated, Establishes True Cost at $522 to $1,183 Per Unit (5 April 2010)
-
Rising blood costs and safety concerns
motivate hospitals to limit use of
transfusions (29 Oct. 2009)
- Tidbit in article: The cost
of a unit of blood has more than
doubled over the past decade, and
hospitals spend an estimated $25
billion to buy, process and
transfuse about 30 million units a
year.
-
Cost of blood donation |
See short video (9 July 2008)
-
Fewer transfusions lowers costs, helps
patient (5 May 2008)
-
The business of blood (Lincoln
Journal Star, 30 Sept. 2007)
- Shander A, Hofmann A, Gombotz H,
Theusinger OM, Spahn DR.
Estimating the cost of blood: past,
present, and future directions. Best
Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2007
Jun;21(2):271-89.
-
Cost of outpatient blood transfusion in
cancer patients (J Clin Oncol I 2000
July;18(14): 2755-61)
-
Comparative costs of blood conservation.
Table 12-7 in:
- Lee LY, DeBois WJ, Krieger KH,
Isom OW. Transfusion Therapy and
Blood Conservation (Chapter 12). In:
Cohn LH, Edmunds LH Jr, eds. Cardiac
Surgery in the Adult. New York:
McGraw-Hill, 2003:389400.
- Rueda A.
Rethinking blood shield statutes in view
of the hepatitis C pandemic and other
emerging threats to the blood supply.
J Health Law 2001 Summer;34(3):419-58.
-
Crotty B.
Blood simple. (article on cost
effectiveness by financial manager of
capital projects at UK National Blood
Services)
-
Wade J.
Direct cost to transfuse (slide
presentation)
- Wilson K, and Paul C. Hébert PC.
The challenge of an increasingly
expensive blood system. CMAJ 2003
Apr29; 168 (9):1149-50.
Various blood conservation strategies
have been used to reduce costs, e.g.,
To learn how the
Hemobag®
can reduce costs, see
Shortages
Blood
shortages exist in the United States and
worldwide. In many industrialized countries
5% or less of the eligible population are
blood donors. Screening for transmissible
diseases and deferral policies for vCJD
designed to improve safety have contributed
to shrinking the donor pool. Blood centers
are increasingly forced to encourage blood
donation with giveaways and the AABB
operates a
National Blood Exchange to help ensure
blood is moved where it is needed.
-
-
-
- Canada -
40% drop in inventory forces rationing
of blood supply - more donors needed
urgently (29 Oct. 2008)
-
Appeal for more blood donor buses as NYC
blood supply at dangerously low levels
(13 Aug. 2008)
-
Hospitals delay more surgeries. Severe
blood shortage continues; donations
encouraged (26 July 2008)
-
ARUP Blood Services summer car giveaway
-
Blood for oil, literally: Donors are
pumping out blood to make life easier at
the gas pump (3 June 2008)
-
Blood supply running low in Utah as
donors sell plasma (10 June 2008)
- Florida:
Blood shortage puts some surgeries on
hold (1 Apr. 2008)
-
Incentives draw in donors. They're
costly, but necessary as blood centers
try to match supply with demand. (23
Dec. 2007)
-
Blood for military in critical shortage
(19 Dec. 2007)
-
More restrictions, generational mind-set
mean fewer Americans are donating blood
(22 Nov. 2007)
- Zou S, Musavi F, Notari EP 4th, Fang
CT; ARCNET Research Group.
Changing age distribution of the blood
donor population in the United States.
Transfusion. 2007 Nov 13; [Epub ahead of
print]
-
S.E. Michigan in jeopardy from critical
blood shortage (22 Aug. 2007)
-
Blood donor pool thinning
(Aug. 5, 2007)
-
Summer blood shortage prompts donation
plea (Aug. 7, 2007)
- Riley W, Schwei M, McCullough J.
The United States' potential blood donor
pool: estimating the prevalence of
donor-exclusion factors on the pool of
potential donors. Transfusion
2007;47 (7), 1180-8.
-
As summer approaches, Red Cross blood
supplies reach dangerous levels (30
May 2007)
-
New rules may shrink ranks of blood
donors (10 Jan. 2007)
-
CJD fears prompt blood donor ban
(BBC)
- AABB
Blood FAQ
THE
HEMOBAG®
For
these reasons the global medical community
has moved away from allogeneic blood and
towards autologous infusion. When blood is
required, the safest blood is almost always
the patient's own autologous blood.
The Hemobag®
is a medical device developed by medical
professionals with years of experience in
cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgery, to
assist in salvaging the patient's own whole
blood in the perioperative setting.
The Hemobag®
makes it easy to get the benefits of
concentrated hyperoncotic whole blood with
the use of any extracorporeal circuit used
in surgery.
With
The Hemobag®
patients receive their own concentrated
whole blood quickly and receive less
allogeneic blood with its associated risks.
The
Hemobag®
takes patients one step
closer to blood free surgery by making their
own Autologous Whole Blood rapidly available
for infusion at the end of the procedure.
Also see
Intraoperative Autologous Blood Salvage and
The Hemobag®
The
Hemobag®
- An Improved Way to Salvage Autologous
Whole Blood in Surgery
| TOP |
BACK
| |